princesslori princesslori

18-09-2016
History

contestada

Why must historians always be skeptical when they read primary sources documents?

Respuesta :

shadowfall shadowfall

18-09-2016

Because they could be biased and strongly opinionated and also the primary source does not have the benefit of hindsight and is therefore not a valid interpretation and less credible

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Richard has just been pulled over by a police officer. He knows why. He was driving 80 miles per hour on a road when he should have only been driving 65 miles p

Which of the following is NOT a true statement about ATP? A.) ATP consists of ribose, adenine, and three phosphate groups. B.) ADP is produced when ATP releases

y= f(x) = 3x. the values of f(1/2) and f(1/4).

Which is the area of a circle with a circumference of 37.68 units? (use 3.14 for pi)

Of the employees who work at Stalling Printing, 90% attended the safety procedures meeting. If 63 employees attended the meeting, how many employees work at Sta

solve for x: 3x − 5 = 2x 6

Mexico city has a pleasant climate all year because of _____.

What solid contains two types of bonds? A.) Iodine B.) Silicon (IV) Oxide C.) NaCl D.) Zinc

if a protein is heated to a high temperature, what do you predict would be the most likely effect on the protein?a)the protein would become denatured, losing it

which sentence is punctuated correctly? a. yes, mrs. lanman we will be at the meeting. b. wow, is that really you standing on my doorstep bill? c. no, doc