melaniegomez110 melaniegomez110
  • 19-10-2020
  • History
contestada

Are the bill of rights necessary

Respuesta :

jose2718246
jose2718246 jose2718246
  • 19-10-2020

Answer:

Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

Answer Link
tanzeilbahar
tanzeilbahar tanzeilbahar
  • 19-10-2020

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Benefits and disadvantages brought about by colonial rule in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.​
provide four examples of ideal solutions to the transportation needs of older adults.
Which of the following is a benefit of direct air capture technology? Sustainable use of fossil fuels Moves carbon into the atmosphere Decreased crop growth
a property listed at $500,000 sold for 5elow the listing price. the property was sold fo
What is the mass of 4. 51 x 10^25 molecules of glucose?
After John Brown's attack on Harpers Ferry, Northern abolitionists: A. Decided that there was no way to end slavery in the South B. Began to leave the Republica
1A LOAD of 2kg is applied today the ends of awire 4m long produces an ectension of 0.24mm. if the diameter of the wire is 2mm find A) the stress an the wire B)
what part of the brain is influential in determining when to sleep?
Can someone please help me?
tell me a little bit about Esperanza's neighborhood. What are the people like? What do other people think of her neighborhood?